| Main » Articles » Vedic Wisdom |
his article is also available in Hindi athttp://agniveer.com/4387/there-is-no-beef-in-vedas-hi/ The material presented here is based on a thorough and objective analysis of roots of Vedic words, the context in which they appear, Vedic Vocabulary, Philology, Grammar and other tools critical for correct interpretation of the Vedic mantras. Thus this research series does not merely rely on blind reproduction of works of Max Muller, Griffith, Wilson, Williams and other indologists on Vedas and Vedic language. While they are more popular in contemporary western academia, we have objective reasons to conclude that their works are far from authoritative. We shall explore this facet in more detail in this research series. Welcome to this first part of the research series on critical evaluation of Misconceptions surrounding the Vedas – the first books of knowledge on earth. For centuries aspersions have been cast upon the Vedas; the primary holy scriptures of the Hindus of having unholy contents. If one really started believing in those aspersions, the entire Hindu philosophy, culture, and traditions would reduce to nothing but savagery, barbarism and cannibalism. The Vedas – the very roots of Hinduism, rather the first source of knowledge on earth – are meant for guiding the actions of human being in order to lead a blissful life. This slanderous campaign has been unleashed by different vested interests to embarrass Hindus around the world citing specific references from the Vedas. This also comes handy in convincing poor and illiterate Indians to give up their faith on the grounds that their fundamental holy books – the Vedas – contain all the inhuman elements like denigration of women, meat-eating, polygamy, casteism and above all – beef eating. The Vedas are also accused of animal sacrifice in sacrificial ceremonies popularly known as the YAJNA. Interestingly a section of home-bred intellectuals claiming to have deep study of ancient India has also come up, who cite references from works of western indologists to prove such unholy content in the Vedas. Saying that the Vedas permit beef-eating and cow-slaughter amounts to striking a lethal blow to a Hindu’s soul. Respect for cow forms a core tenet of Hinduism. Once you are able to convince him of flaws in the foundation of this core tenet and make him feel guilty, he becomes an easy prey for the predator faiths. There are millions of ill-informed Hindus who are not empowered to counter argue and hence quietly surrender. The vested interests that malign the Vedas are not confined to foreign and home-bred indologists alone. A certain class among Hindus exploited the rest of the population including the socially and economically weaker sections by forcing them to believe and follow what they said in the name of Vedas or else face the wrath. All the slanders heaped upon the Vedas can be attributed mainly to the interpretations of commentaries written by Mahidhar, Uvat and Saayan in the medieval times; and to what Vam-margis or the Tantra cult propagated in their books in the name of the Vedas. In due course the falsehood spread far and wide and they became even more deep rooted when western scholars with their half baked knowledge of Sanskrit transliterated these interpretations of commentaries of Sayan and Mahidhar, in the name of translating the Vedas. However, they lacked the pre-requisite understanding of Shiksha (Phonetics), Vyakarana (Grammar), Nirukta (Philology), Nighantu (Vocabulary), Chhanda (Prosody), Jyotish (Astronomy), Kalpa and so on that are critical for correct interpretation of the Vedas. The purpose behind Agniveer movement is to objectively evaluate all such misconceptions about the Vedas – the foundation of human knowledge and establish their piety, sanctity, great ideals and philosophy that cater not only to Hindus but to every human being without bars, bias or discrimination of any kind. Section 1: No violence against animals—————————————— "Those who see all beings as souls do not feel infatuation or anguish at their sight, for they experience oneness with them”. O teeth! You eat rice, you eat barley, you gram and you eat sesame. These cereals are specifically meant for you. Do not kill those who are capable of being fathers and mothers. How could there be justification of cow and other animals being killed when killing is so clearly prohibited in the Vedas? "O human! animals are Aghnya – not to be killed. Protect the animals” Protect the animals. Protect the bipeds and quadrupeds! Pisacha — pisita [meat] +asa [eater]—the meat eater. Asutrpa — Asu [breath of life] + trpa [one who satisfies himself on]—one who takes others life for his meals. Garba da and Anda da – the foetus and egg eaters. Mans da – the meat eaters Meat eaters have always been looked down in Vedic literature. They have been known as Rakshasas, Pisacha and so on….All these words are synonyms of demons or devils that have been out-cast from the civilized human society. "May all bipeds and quadrupeds gain strength and nourishment” This mantra is recited by Hindus before every meal. How could the same philosophy which prays for well-being of every soul in every moment of life, approve of killing animals? Section 2: No violence in YajnaYajna never meant animal sacrifice in the sense popularly understood. Yajna in the Vedas meant a noble deed or the highest purifying action. —————————————– According to Yaaska Acharya, one of the synonyms of Yajna in Nirukta or the Vedic philology is Adhvara. Dhvara means an act with himsa or violence. And therefore a-dhvara means an act involving no himsa or no violence. There are a large number of such usage of Adhvara in the Vedas. In the post-Mahabharata period, misinterpretation of the Vedas and interpolations in other scriptures took place at various points intime. Acharya Shankar reestablished the Vedic values to an extent. In the more recent times, Swami Dayanand Saraswati – known as the grandfather of modern India – interpreted the Vedas as per thecorrect rules of the language and authentic evidences. His literature, which includes commentary on the Vedas, Satyarth Prakash loosely translated as Light of Truth, An Introduction to the Vedas and other texts led to widespread social reformation based on Vedic philosophy and dispelling of myths surrounding the Vedas. Let us discover what the Vedas have to say on Yajna. ————————————– O lord of effulgence! The non-violent Yajna, you prescribe from all sides, is beneficial for all, touches divine proportions and is accepted by noble souls. The Rigveda describes Yajna as Adhvara or non violent throughout. Same is the case with all the other Vedas. How can it be then concluded that the Vedas permit violence or slaughter of animals? The biggest accusation of cattle and cow slaughter comes in the context of the Yajnas that derived their names from different cattle like the Ashwamedh Yajna, the Gomedha Yajna and the Nar-medh Yajna. Even by the wildest stretch of the imagination the word Medha would not mean slaughter in this context. It’s interesting to note what Yajurveda says about a horse Do not slaughter this one hoofed animal that neighs and who goes with a speed faster than most of the animals. Aswamedha does not mean horse sacrifice at Yajna. Instead the Yajurveda clearly mentions that a horse ought not to be slaughtered. In Shathapatha, Ashwa is a word for the nation or empire The word medha does not mean slaughter. It denotes an act done in accordance to the intellect Alternatively it could mean consolidation, as evident from the root meaning of medha i.e. medhru san-ga-me Raashtram vaa ashwamedhah Swami Dayananda Saraswati wrote in his Light of Truth: A Yajna dedicated to the glory, wellbeing and prosperity of the Rashtra the nation or empire is known as the Ashwamedh yajna. "To keep the food pure or to keep the senses under control, or to make the food pure or to make a good use of the rays of Sun or keep the earth free from impurities[clean] is called Gomedha Yajna”. "The word Gau also means the Earth and the yajna dedicated to keep the Earth the environment clean is called Gomedha Yajna” "The cremation of the body of a dead person in accordance with the principles laid down in the Vedas is called Naramedha Yajna”. Section 3: No beef in VedasNot only the Vedas are against animal slaughter but also vehemently oppose and prohibit cow slaughter.Yajurveda forbids killing of cows, for they provide energizing food for human beings ——————————— Do not kill cows and bulls who always deserve to be protected. —————————————- In Rigveda cow slaughter has been declared a heinous crime equivalent to human murder and it has been said that those who commits this crime should be punished. The Aghnya cows – which are not to be killed under any circumstances– may keep themselves healthy by use of pure water and green grass, so that we may be endowed with virtues, knowledge and wealth. ————————————— These three names of cow signify that the animal ought not to be put to tortures. These words appear frequently throughout the Vedas in context of the cow. ——————————————– Aghnyeyam saa vardhataam mahate soubhagaaya Rigveda 1.164.27 Suprapaanam Bhavatvaghnyaayaah Yah paurusheyena kravishaa samankte yo ashwena pashunaa yaatudhaanah Yo aghnyaayaa bharati ksheeramagne teshaam sheershaani harasaapi vrishcha Those who feed on human, horse or animal flesh and those who destroy milk-giving Aghnya cows should be severely punished. Vimucchyadhvamaghnyaa devayaanaa aganma Maa gaamanaagaamaditim vadhishta Antakaaya goghaatam Yadi no gaam hansi yadyashwam yadi poorusham If someone destroys our cows, horses or people, kill him with a bullet of lead. Vatsam jaatamivaaghnyaa Dhenu sadanam rayeenaam The entire 28th Sukta or Hymn of 6th Mandal of Rigveda sings the glory of cow. Bhooyobhooyo rayimidasya vardhayannabhinne Na taa nashanti na dabhaati taskaro naasaamamitro vyathiraa dadharshati Na taa arvaa renukakaato ashnute na samskritramupa yanti taa abhi Gaavo bhago gaava indro me achhaan Yooyam gaavo medayathaa Maa vah stena eeshata maaghanshasah 1. Everyone should ensure that cows are free from miseries and kept healthy. 6. If cows keep healthy and happy, men and women shall also keep disease free and prosperous 7. May the cow eat green grass and pure water. May they not be killed and bring prosperity to us. ———————————————- What more proofs does one need to understand the high esteem in whichnot only the cow but each living being is held in the Vedas. The learned audience can decide for themselves from these evidences that the Vedas are completely against any inhuman practice… to top it all the Beef and Cow slaughter. There is no Beef in Vedas.—————————————— 1. Rigveda Bhashya – Commentary on Rigveda by Swami Dayanand Saraswati 2. Yajurveda Bhashya – Commentary on Yajurveda by Swami Dayanand Saraswati 4. Vedon ka Yatharth Swaroop (True nature of Vedas) by Pt Dharmadeva Vidyavachaspati 6. Pracheen Bharat me Gomamsa – Ek Sameeksha (Beef in Ancient India – an analysis) by Geeta Press, Gorakhpur Addendum on 14 April 2010: After this article, there was severe reaction from various sources who cannot live with the fact that Vedas and ancient culture of our nation could have been more ideal than their current communistic ideals. I received several mails that tried to refute the articles by citing additional references that support beef-eating. These include 2 mantras from Rigveda, and some Shlokas from Manu Smriti and a few other texts. An example is the comment from Avtar Gill on this page itself. On these, I have to say the following: a. The article has given evidence from Manu Smriti itself which states that even one who permits killing is a murderer. Thus all these additional shlokas are either from adulterated Manu Smriti or misinterpreted by twisting of words. I recommend them to read Manu Smriti by Dr Surendra Kumar which is available from http://vedicbooks.com b. A typical example of foul play by those hell-bent on justifying their obsession with beef in ancient texts, is to translate Mansa as ‘meat’. In reality, ‘Mansa’ is a generic word used to denote pulp. Meat is called ‘Mansa’ because it is pulpy. So mere presence of ‘Mansa’ does not mean it refers to meat. c. The other texts referred by them are among dubious ones not considered authoritative evidence. Their modus operandi is simple – state anything written in Sanskrit as Dharma and translate the way they want to prove whatever they want. This is how they have been fooling us all by filling our textbooks with all unverified demeaning claims. d. With regards to Vedas, they could come up with two mantras that supposedly justify beef eating. Let us evaluate them: Claim: Rigveda (10/85/13) declares, "On the occasion of a girl’s marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.” How can a cow killed in winter regain its health in spring? This amply proves how ignorant and biased communists malign Vedas. Fact: The mantra states that brilliant scholars enlighten the world in the manner that wood enhances the fire of Yajna. I fail to understand from where did Avtar Gill and his friends discover Indra, cow, calf, horse and buffalo in this mantra! In summary, I continue the challenge to everyone – cite one single mantra from Vedas that justify beef-eating and I shall be eager to embrace any faith that he or she may decide for me. If not, they should agree to revert back to the Vedas. This article is also available in Hindi at http://agniveer.com/4387/there-is-no-beef-in-vedas-hi/ | |
| Views: 6281 | Comments: 5 | Rating: 0.0/0 |
| Total comments: 1 | ||
| ||
